I recently came across some important
news that is essential for you to know if you are
seeking to get all the value from one of the most
important vitamins we know, vitamin D.
As a reader of this newsletter, you’re
likely familiar with my advice to make sure you get your
vitamin D levels tested regularly, especially if you are
taking an oral vitamin D supplement.
Vitamin D deficiency is rampant not
just in the U.S., but worldwide, and research into
vitamin D status and its effects on your health has
grown tremendously in the past couple of years, showing
that previously recommended levels are insufficient to
reap any major health benefits.
This has led to a surge in vitamin D
testing, with labs like Quest doing some 500,000 tests
per month!

Unfortunately, recent developments in
2008 have made it clear that there are irregularities in
the values obtained from the different testing methods.
Although results from any of the three commonly used
assays may be analytically accurate, they might
not be clinically accurate, which is,
ultimately, what matters.
Therefore, I’d like to review the
essentials of vitamin D testing again, and give you a
vital update on how to ensure you’re actually getting
accurate test results.
First -- Order
the Correct Test
First of all, it is very important
that your physician orders the correct test as there are
two vitamin D tests -- 1,25(OH)D, and 25(OH)D.
25(OH)D is the better marker of
overall D status. It is this marker that is most
strongly associated with overall health.
The correct test is 25(OH)D,
also called 25-hydroxyvitamin D.
Second –
Measure Your Results Against Optimal Values
Please note the difference between
normal and optimal. You don't want to be average here;
you want to be optimally healthy.
These optimal values have been
confirmed by more recent studies into vitamin D status
and its effects on health and reduced disease risks.
OPTIMAL
25-Hydroxyvitamin D Values
45-50 ng/ml or
115-128 nmol/l |
NORMAL
25-Hydroxyvitamin D lab Values
20-56 ng/ml
50-140 nmol/l |
Your vitamin D level should NEVER be below 32
ng/ml.
Any levels below 20 ng/ml are considered serious
defiency states and will increase your risk of
breast and prostate cancer and autoimmune
diseases like MS and rheumatoid arthritis. |
If you have the above test performed,
please recognize that many commercial labs are using the
older, dated reference ranges. The above values are the
most recent ones based on large-scale clinical research
findings.
Third -- Make
Sure Your Lab Uses the STANDARD Assay
There are a number of different
companies that have FDA approval to perform vitamin D
testing, but the gold standard is
DiaSorin. Their radioimmunoassay (RIA) method for
measuring total vitamin D levels has become the gold
standard, not because it’s more accurate than the
others, but because it’s the one used in almost every
major vitamin D study, on which the recommended blood
levels for clinical efficacy are based.
Therefore, in order for any other
testing method to offer clinically relevant results, the
test values must agree with DiaSorin RIA results, since
those were used to establish the recommended levels.
Vitamin D status is measured by looking at blood levels
of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3. There are three common methods
used for measuring vitamin D3:
-
LC-MS/MS
-- This test measures 25-hydroxyvitamin D2 and
D3 separately
-
RIA
(DiaSorin) -- Developed in 1985,
it accurately measures total
25-hydroxyvitamin D (It does not separate D2 and
D3)
-
Liaison
(DiaSorin) --
a more recently developed automated
immunoassay by DiaSorin that has largely
replaced the RIA
The LC-MS/MS (liquid
chromotatography-mass spectrometry) method is the
preferred method for many labs, including the Mayo
Clinic, Quest Labs, Esoterix, ZRT, and others, while
Liaison is favored by other testing labs like LabCorp.
Since the DiaSorin assay (RIA) was
used in the major clinical studies that led to the
recommended vitamin D levels, any lab using the LC-MS/MS
method needs to make sure their test correlates with the
RIA test values in order to accurately determine your
vitamin D status.
WARNING: Your
Lab Can Give You the WRONG Results!
It recently came to our attention that
the test Quest uses, while analytically accurate, gives
vitamin D values that are consistently about 25-40
percent higher than the DiaSorin assay.
What does this mean?
If you are using Quest labs you are
getting FALSE reassurances that your levels are accurate
and may even stop or discontinue treatment thinking that
you are in the toxic range when you still need more
vitamin D.
Some labs, such as ZRT and the Mayo
Clinic, have recognized the severity of this problem and
have already calibrated their LC-MS/MS results against
the DiaSorin RIA values -- in order to be clinically
applicable -- whereas Quest has failed to do so.
This is a serious problem since Quest
probably runs the most vitamin D assays of any lab in
the U.S.
Which Lab
Should You Use?
The single biggest concern in this
area is Quest Labs as their lab is reporting results as
much as 40 percent higher than those
found with the DiaSorin assay. That means, if you are
seeking to obtain levels similar to those that have been
confirmed optimal in the scientific literature, you will
be falsely reassured by their test results.
At this point in time Quest has NOT
recalibrated their test values to be aligned with
DiaSorin, and it appears unlikely that they will do so
anytime in the near future. Making matters worse, Quest
is currently doing over 500,000 tests a month -- much of
this increase has occurred over the past year -- and the
consistent reports we are getting from the field is that
many split samples being sent to them are coming back
widely different, indicating a lack of consistency and
quality. The LC-MS/MS is clearly a highly accurate test,
but only in the hands of experienced technicians who
have the time to do the test properly, and only if it’s
calibrated against the RIA.
Liaison, which is a more recently
developed DiaSorin test that renders clinically accurate
results, is also a much more accurate testing method for
high volume throughput of tests, and does not depend as
much on lab technician’s expertise.
LabCorp uses this method, which makes
them better able to handle large volumes of tests
without sacrificing clinical accuracy or worrying about
the qualifications of the staff.
Additionally the charge for the Lab
Corp test should be less than half of that of the Quest
test.
For all these reasons I now strongly
recommend using LabCorp for these reasons until Quest
can guarantee accurate, usable results.
The Vitamin D
Council to the Rescue
The Vitamin D Council puts out a
monthly newsletter that is well worth subscribing to for
the latest news on all issues related to this essential
vitamin. In
their last newsletter, Dr. John Cannel offers the
following recommendation:
Find out which labs in your town
use Quest Diagnostics and which use LabCorp. Have a
25(OH)D test at both labs the same day (you will have to
pay for them yourself). Then send both results to the
Vitamin D Council at:
info@vitamindcouncil.com. If Quest Diagnostics does
not fix their 25(OH)D test, the Vitamin D Council will
fix it for them.
We
Need Your Help
It is my sincere hope that Quest will
change their testing method, and correct their serious
errors which are placing many thousands of people at
risk due to inaccurate information. If you have had your
vitamin D test taken by Quest, I want to encourage you
to get it done again by LabCorp as soon as you can. I'd
also like to request that you email your results to
brianb@mercola.com.
This is especially important if you are a physician or
health care professional. The more results and reports
we have, the sooner Quest will need to make the
necessary changes to provide patients and physicians
accurate results.